by Misterboy
I'm not sure what to say in response to that James. I've re-typed my response several times.In summary, I disagree with most of what you wrote for various specific reasons which are largely stated within my session report. I do agree with your conclusion which seems to agree with the overall point I was trying to make in my session report.
I feel the need to point out that I feel the entire tone and intent of my session report has been misinterpreted. Perhaps that is my fault, not having crafted it better, though I already spent far more time writing it than I intended. I'm sorry I've bruised your ego, that was not my intent. My intent was to convey a game that blindsided us, even after we made realizations that should have prevented that fact. It was meant to present a tone of irony and fun. The game was hilarious to me because I apparently watched it unfold from a different perspective than you.
I'm laughing at us, and went out of my way to set myself up as the greatest clown by far. I saw what I saw and experienced what I experienced and I stand by my session report.
But to be clear, I humbly apologize for offending you and JP. I hold you both in very high esteem, both as people and especially as "gamers".