k0w0k wrote:
I sent the designer, Richard James, a question and this was his response:
k0w0k wrote:
This may be painfully obvious to some, but does this mean a.)highest number (Example: 99 out ranks 50, so 99 wins) or b.)what I define as highest ranking number (Example: 4 out ranks 33, so 4 wins)??
In this case your first example is correct. Each clan/card has a unique (rank) number. So, it is always possible to break ties by comparing the ranks written on the clans/cards in each army. In the case of a tie between two armies, the army with the clan/card with the highest (rank) number of all the clan/cards in those two armies, wins.
Hopefully that helps.
... Richard
k0w0k wrote:
This may be painfully obvious to some, but does this mean a.)highest number (Example: 99 out ranks 50, so 99 wins) or b.)what I define as highest ranking number (Example: 4 out ranks 33, so 4 wins)??
In this case your first example is correct. Each clan/card has a unique (rank) number. So, it is always possible to break ties by comparing the ranks written on the clans/cards in each army. In the case of a tie between two armies, the army with the clan/card with the highest (rank) number of all the clan/cards in those two armies, wins.
Hopefully that helps.
... Richard
Yes. This is how we eventually concluded the argument, albeit some were a bit unsettled by the interpretation. If the term "rank" is interchangeable with the generic word "number", then indeed this clears up the issue.