by calandale
rzaleski wrote:
We all tend to get protective of Reviews of games we love.
I think THAT'S a problem when it comes to attacking the
review itself, rather than the merits of the points raised.
Now, if you had some detailed defense of the mechanisms, and
how realistic they are, I'd be interested to see that. To defend
the game against the charges is one thing. To claim the charges
are simply invalid, because the reviewer sees the game from a
different point of view is not.